Examine This Report on breach of condition case law pdf
Examine This Report on breach of condition case law pdf
Blog Article
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this component for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed under have had opinions filed for them within the final fourteen days. The following information is readily available for Just about every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which include signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, as being the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, rather he continues to be acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is very well-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed of your boy’s past, they asked if their children were Secure with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they had nothing to worry about.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation features the names in the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it absolutely was decided, and also the book in which it is recorded. Different citation requirements could involve italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is a regulation that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, alternatively than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, helping you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then strategy more info the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the 90 times for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
Problems or Errors For those who encounter any technical problems with this website (like a lousy link or even a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Heart.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.